Previously, students were highly regarded as assets of any educational institution and were believed to be the future of the nation. There was a slight transition in these conceptions, which shifted their value from being assets to be clients. Now that the time and educational metrics have greatly evolved, the students are considered nothing but a mere consumer. There aren’t any apparent differences in the meanings of both since each of these are the sources of revenue for institutions. The divergence lies in the context of service provision intentions. Clients are provided services with an intention to create and sustain long-standing relationships by the company whereas the consumers are those who are most often involved in one or two times purchase and there is no future connection with them in sight.
This deviation has crotched in the mindsets of business entities with the growing trends of generating more revenues and profits rather than building relationships with prospective clients. The time before the 1960s showed greater exertions from the students to acquire knowledge and learning under the best of expertise and guidance. Ever since the start of the 1960s, a deviation in the attitudes of students was evident. They invoked certain changes in the educational system, such as changes in the curriculum, removal of certain courses, and adding only relevant courses to ease the pressures of educational concerns. Moreover, tough policies for attendance, exams, and passing criteria too were renewed with ease.
Educationalists too found their benefit as the chance to elevate their tuition and academic charges so they let the mindset get passed on from one person to other and so on. The market forces have affirmed positive responses in converting educational institutes as mere consumer markets to provide the degrees as valueless commodities, which anyone can attain without any meaningful struggles. This all has just turned into a game of dollars and Euros and whoever has the bills can get a certified piece of paper without actually learning or educating himself. Course evaluations done by students have added fuel to the fire since they feel free to de-valuate any course to make it exempt from the university-approved curriculum. This harvests a consumer-centric approach in them which drives them to select the services which only they want to and leave what they dislike.
Competition for better grades and marks has turned this approach even stringent and rigorous than ever. Many students get enrolled in several short courses or certifications. Apparently, it exhibits an idea that they want to learn but if one can read between the lines, he could easily judge their true intentions. It is a sheer spurt of targeting more certificates that could outshine their resumes but with little or no practical knowledge and has little to do with actual education. Although there might be some students who achieve an education to literally get knowledge and exposure, their ratio challenges finding a needle in the haystack.
Teachers have played a major role in the decentralization of students and bringing them on the verge of materialistic education. Often, when students are devalued by their teachers or assessor for being compatible or skillful, they starting budding complex emotions. This ultimately lands them in pursuing a degree that could verify their attending the classes but provides no proof of their intellect and capability. The learning is improvised only when there is an active involvement from both the teachers and students. Since teachers de-value their students or underestimate their potentials, they design fewer strategies or programs that could bring their talent up and enable them to identify what they are capable of.
The upshot closure is wrapped up with the culmination that the whole drive from being an asset to being a consumer is not at all a single-sided perspective. Numerous factors have played their cards well. Teachers and educational institutions are the evident ones in this regard. Although the fact stands the same that they have just responded to the wish-list of the students, they shouldn’t have. Rather, it is their utmost responsibility to compel their students for a brighter perspective of education seeking and guide them to the best of practices through which they could retain their valuable identities and truly serve as the assets of their prospective organizations.
Ron Olive is an expert researcher and academic influencer who has wide experience in writing research articles on different niches, including education, tech, laptops, computers and other academic subjects to help the students across the world. Ron is affiliated with various cheap essay writing services agencies as a professional writer. He believes in crafting the imaginative ideas to engage the readers in getting his point of views effectively.